Showing posts with label pressure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pressure. Show all posts

Saturday, April 01, 2023

The Ubiquitous, Endless Loop of Suck




"Me and him both. I say to him all the time, ‘Listen, buddy, I know it sucks for you, but there are way more people saying that I suck than you do.'" 
--Dan Hurley, head coach of NCAA basketball champion University of Connecticut, discussing conversations during the season with his point guard Tristen Newton

 

For years, I have become increasingly amazed at the frequency with which I and most other people use the word "suck." Here are some typical examples:

Present Tense

Self:  I suck.

One's Talent/Competency:  I suck at that. 

Other:  He/she sucks.

Others:  Boy, they suck.

What another thinks:  He/she thinks I suck.

What others think:  They think I suck.

Consensus:  Everyone thinks that sucks.  Everyone knows that sucks.  Everyone knows I suck.

Empathy/Observation:  Dude, that sucks!  

Event/Self (Certainty/Spoken by Others with Empathy):  That's gotta suck.

Events/Groups:  Man, those guys suck.  

Environment/Culture:  It sucks over there. 

The present tense of suck suggests the absolute nature of sucking.  Suck is all or none.  You, it, or they either suck or don't.  There is typically no mild or moderate in the word suck.  It either sucks or it doesn't.  If you suck, you suck in the extreme.  

Granted, the use of the word "suckish" has gained some popularity.  This new development suggests various levels or a dimensionality of the suck.  It opens the door for the existence of a "suck spectrum," or the awareness that things, events and people can be on the suck spectrum.  You, indeed, can be on the suck spectrum.  

Primarily, the effect of the present tense of suck is anticipatory anxiety.  Its use suggests that there is something to dread and avoid on the horizon.   It disrupts the ability to fully prepare for the situation.  It triggers the stress/trauma response and stimulates old neural pathways and connections between the mid-brain and the cortex about past experiences that sucked (and remember, they were was extreme and absolute).  It sets up a hypervigilance and anxiousness that affects cognitive functioning and optimal performance.  Often, it also leads to procrastination.

More importantly, however, is the disruption of any real possibility of proceeding with the activity in a relaxed, confident flow state.  

Past tense 

I sucked, he/she sucked, they sucked, he thought I sucked, they think I sucked.

One's Talent/Competency:  I sucked at that.

This use of the past tense of suck has the tendency to intensify our post-performance anxiety.  It keeps us stuck in the past and reduces our ability to learn, and increases the likelihood of an ongoing narrative that focuses on failure.  It tends to lead to harsh self-criticism and evaluation of our future performances. 

Future Tense

Self/Future tense:  I'm gonna suck.  I always suck at that.

Event (Prediction):  I bet that'll suck.

Certainty/Future tense:  That's gonna suck.

Certainty/Permanence:  That always sucks.

Chandler Bing Versions  (These upgraded suck statements are a little more healthy and helpful.) 

Could this be any more suckish? (Yes, most certainly.)

Could this suck any worse?  (Yes, definitely.)

It couldn't suck any worse than this.  (Again, yes, indeed.)

Should you be intent on using the verb or adjective "suck," you could transition gently to the following versions of the word.  

Less common internal dialogue that includes the verb "suck."  

This might suck.  

This could suck.

Let's see if this sucks.

This could suck a little (but maybe not).

I will challenge myself to not suck as badly as before.

Post-Performance Evaluation Suggestions

The antidote to using the past tense of suck is asking such post-performance questions as:

What didn't suck about that?

How could I have sucked less?

What can I learn to do instead to reduce the suckishness?

What did I do that didn't suck?  

How can I increase my non-suckish behavior? 

What part of the suck did I not contribute to?   

In general, self-talk or internal dialogue can be very difficult to identify and even harder to change. When I work with my clients I usually suggest they monitor what they say to themselves prior, during and after they perform any important activity. When they look carefully at any activity they engage in, whether they experience anxiety during the activity or not, I suggest that they pay attention to their self-talk. Usually, they ask for examples to help them identify their particular self-talk. If I give them examples, they often do not personally identify with the examples. I think that is because self-talk is often very unique to them and is often based on their particular childhood developmental experiences and the types of environments in which they grew up.  

Most recently, it occurred to me that to best analyze self-talk, it is helpful to look at the timing of the self-talk (present, past or future) and where it occurs in the sequence of an activity.  Additionally, it is important in that it might help you to determine what type of anxiety you tend to exhibit (anticipatory anxiety, pre-performance anxiety, or post-performance anxiety).  Whether we are talking about social anxiety, public speaking anxiety (reportedly the most common anxiety), performance anxiety, etc. the self-talk tends to have certain characteristics and timing. This is where your analysis of your  signature use of the word "suck" can be very helpful.

Writer's Note #1:  After reading this post, my wife said, "This article was much less 'suckish' than most of the ones you write."

Writer's Note #2:  No part of this blogpost was generated by AI.  

To watch the San Francisco 49ers' Greg Kittle discuss more about his "reset button," click here:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617904357638549506

Thursday, September 09, 2010

Caroline Wozniacki: New Star in Women's Tennis

"Pressure is when you're put on the spot and you don't feel like you belong there, don't think you deserve to be there. I think I deserve to be where I am, and I think that I'm feeling comfortable there."

--Caroline Wozniacki, finalist in last year's U.S. Open and #1 ranked woman in this year's Open.

Wozniacki breezed through the first set in her quarterfinal match with Dominika Cibulkova, as she has in every one of her matches so far in New York, winning 6-2, 7-5. Cilbulkova and Wozniacki had to suffer through a windy evening that affected both of their games. It was the first time in five matches that a player has taken more than four games in a set from Wozniacki in this Open. This was her 13th straight match win and she is 18-1 since Wimbledon.

"It felt like we were playing in a hurricane or something," Wozniacki said. "But it was the same for both players. I'm happy to get through."

The Dane is aggressive and one of the best defensive players. She is known for her "counter-punches." She wins points by forcing opponent errors and energetically running down balls. Her speed and athleticism allow her to retrieve most balls hit by her opponent. On Wednesday, the top-seeded played an aggressive game and controlled many of the points.

Wozniacki was a surprise runner-up to Kim Clijsters at last year's Open. This year she defeated former champion Maria Sharapova 6-3 6-4 Monday to reach the quarter-finals.

"I definitely think I've improved a lot, not only physically, but also I believe in myself more. I believe I can do it," she said. "Also I think I can mix up my game a little bit more than I could last year."

Boxing is one of Wozniacki's off-court interests and the 20-year-old's training includes boxing for conditioning.

"Boxing, it's just a different way for me to work out," she told reporters after her 6-2 7-5 quarter-final victory. "I'm really competitive. I really don't like losing."

Excerpts taken from www.nypost.com (8/29/2010) and Reuters.com.

For more on performance psychology, click on The Handbook of Peak Performance.

Monday, June 08, 2009

Dinara Safina: Too Much Pressure in French Open Championship Loss


"The pressure I put on myself because I really wanted to win.

"I just didn't handle it. I was a little bit desperate on the court, and didn't do the things that I had to do. I didn't stay tough mentally. I lost myself."

--Dinara Safina, the world's number one ranked women's tennis player, after losing 6-4 6-2 to fellow Russian Svetlana Kuznetsova on Saturday, June 6, 2009.


In a clue as to her pre-match mental mindset Safina had said before the final, "How much proof do I need to give to people that I deserve to be number one?" Safina had been irritated about criticism concerning whether she deserved to be ranked at the top. Perhaps that was where the excessive pressure came from.

Kuznetsova took advantage of the No. 1-ranked Safina's nerves and frequent errors and won the French Open final, a 74-minute match which ended with Safina's seventh double-fault.

"She was too tight. She had so much pressure on her. I just played the match. It was just one more match. ... Definitely it was a lot of emotions inside of me, but I control it."

--Svetlana Kutnetsova, 2004 U.S. Open champion.


So, what has Safina learned having now funished runner-up in the season's opening two majors?

"Not to put so much pressure on myself."

Excerpts from Reuters and Yahoo.com (June 7, 2009)

For more on Peak Performance, click on The Handbook of Peak Performance.